For Consideration

Bring something to our attention.

EDIT27 welcomes introductions to restaurants, hotels, bars, designers, cultural projects, independent businesses and places whose work may warrant closer attention.

Some of our stories begin with months of research. Others begin with a recommendation from a reader, a short email from an owner, a note from somebody working in the city, or an opening we nearly missed.

What matters is not who sends the introduction.

What matters is whether there is a story.

What EDIT27 considers

EDIT27 covers Culture, Food, Fashion and Night, with a particular interest in the way cities are experienced through hospitality, design, people and place.

We are interested in subjects that give us something meaningful to examine.

That may be a newly opened restaurant with an unusually considered approach to service. A hotel that has changed an important building rather than merely occupied it. A bar that understands the city around it. A designer working outside the usual fashion calendar. A long-established institution whose reputation deserves to be reconsidered. Or a small place with almost no publicity that happens to be doing something exceptionally well.

Scale is not a criterion.

Price is not a criterion.

Being difficult to reserve is not a criterion.

A five-star hotel does not receive preference because it is a five-star hotel, and a small restaurant does not need international recognition before it can interest us.

We look for specificity, quality, relevance and a reason to look more closely.

‍

What makes a strong introduction

The best submissions are surprisingly simple.

Tell us:

• what the place, project or subject is;
• where it is;
• who is behind it;
• when it opened, launched or became relevant;
• what distinguishes it from comparable places or projects;
• why you believe EDIT27 should look at it now;
• and how we can verify the information.

If you are connected to the subject, tell us how.

An owner should say that they are the owner. A publicist should identify the client they represent. An agency should not write as though it were an independent customer.

That disclosure does not make a submission less interesting. It simply allows us to understand where the information comes from.

‍

The question we care about most

Why should EDIT27 look more closely?

A precise answer to that question is considerably more useful than a long account of awards, celebrity visitors, social-media reach or how luxurious something is supposed to be.

‍

What we are unlikely to pursue

We receive many announcements that describe a place as unique, exclusive, iconic, immersive or the ultimate destination without explaining what actually happens there.

Those words are not reasons for coverage.

We are also unlikely to pursue submissions whose principal argument is that a business:

• has opened;
• is expensive;
• has a famous address;
• has received an award;
• has been visited by celebrities;
• has a large social-media following;
• uses premium ingredients;
• has been designed to photograph well;
• describes itself as luxury;
• or would benefit commercially from appearing in EDIT27.

Any of those facts may be relevant. None is, on its own, an editorial premise.

We generally do not consider mass-distributed press releases, generic product announcements, undifferentiated promotional campaigns or requests whose main purpose is acquiring a backlink.

We also do not publish invented rankings, guaranteed recommendations or favourable coverage in exchange for payment, gifts, reciprocal promotion or commercial services.

Restaurants, hotels and bars

For hospitality subjects, we are interested in what happens beyond the concept statement.

A beautiful room may interest us. So may an ambitious menu. Neither tells us whether the restaurant works.

We may look at the reservation process, arrival, service, food and beverage, atmosphere, privacy, pacing, pricing, design, accessibility, the relationship between staff and guests, and whether the experience makes sense in the city where it exists.

For hotels, that may extend from the booking process and arrival sequence to rooms, restaurants, bars, wellness, public spaces, service culture and how the property relates to its neighbourhood.

For night-time venues, we are particularly interested in places that contribute something to the social life of a city rather than merely remaining open after dark.

A submission does not need to address every one of these areas. But it should give us a reason to believe there is something worth investigating.

Fashion and cultural subjects

We consider independent labels, established houses, designers, photographers, artists, exhibitions, institutions and other cultural work when there is a genuine editorial reason to do so.

A new collection or exhibition opening is not automatically a story.

We are interested in authorship, craft, cultural context, influence, contradiction, design and the circumstances in which work is produced and experienced.

For fashion submissions, lookbooks and campaign imagery can be helpful, but we would rather understand the thinking behind the work than receive another collection of adjectives describing

New openings

We do consider new openings.

Being new, however, is not enough.

If a hotel, restaurant, bar, gallery or store has not yet opened, tell us what is actually confirmed and what remains proposed.

Renderings should be identified as renderings. Projected opening dates should not be presented as final when they are not. Claims about future service, menus, facilities or partnerships should be clearly distinguished from what already exists.

In some cases, we may choose to wait until a place has been operating long enough for there to be something meaningful to assess.

‍

Places that are not new

‍

We are equally interested in places that have existed for decades.

Age does not make a subject irrelevant.

A restaurant may become more interesting after twenty years than it was after twenty days. A hotel may matter because of how it has adapted, who continues to use it, or what its history reveals about a city.

‍

Reader recommendations

‍

You do not need to represent a business to recommend it.

Some of the most useful introductions come from readers who have no relationship to the place at all.

If you discovered a restaurant, hotel, bar, designer or cultural space that you believe deserves closer attention, tell us why.

You do not need to write a formal pitch.

A few intelligent sentences are enough.

‍

Owners, operators and publicists

Owners, operators, agencies and publicists are welcome to contact us directly.

There is no disadvantage to telling us who you represent.

There is also no advantage to disguising that relationship.

A useful introduction contains facts, access to relevant material and a clear explanation of why the subject matters. It does not attempt to dictate the angle, headline, conclusion or publication date of any resulting editorial work.

Sending information to EDIT27 does not create an agreement to publish

‍

Press visits, meals and stays

You may indicate whether press access, an interview, a visit, a meal or a stay can be arranged.

That information can be useful.

An invitation does not guarantee publication and does not guarantee a favourable assessment.

Where hospitality, travel, products or other material benefits relevant to a story are provided without charge or at a preferential rate, EDIT27 handles that relationship in accordance with The EDIT27 Standard, including appropriate disclosure where required.

We do not accept invitations that are conditional on positive coverage or prior approval of independent editorial conclusions.

‍

Payment and editorial consideration

Paying EDIT27, EDIT27 Advisory, an EDIT27 contributor or any associated service does not increase the likelihood of independent editorial coverage.

Editorial recommendations, inclusion in editorial selections and favourable assessments cannot be purchased.

Commercial partnerships, where offered, are handled separately and must be identified as commercial material.

A consultancy relationship with EDIT27 Advisory is not an editorial package.

‍

‍

What not to send

Please do not send:

• requests for guaranteed rankings or recommendations;
• requests to insert undisclosed paid links;
• backlink-exchange proposals;
• fabricated customer testimonials;
• unverified awards or credentials;
• altered screenshots presented as evidence;
• AI-generated images presented as photographs of real places;
• confidential personal information that is not necessary for the story;
• embargoed information without clearly stating the embargo;
• or repeated follow-ups asking whether payment would change our decision.

If a commercial collaboration is what you are looking for, say so directly. It should not be presented as independent editorial consideration.

‍

Images and supporting material

You may include links to photography, menus, press material, background documents, architectural information, lookbooks or other material that helps us understand the subject.

Please identify who owns the imagery and whether publication rights are available.

Do not describe a rendering as a photograph.

Do not submit heavily altered imagery as documentary material without telling us.

Large files are better provided through a stable download link rather than as numerous email attachments.

Providing images does not mean those images will necessarily be used.

‍

Embargoes and confidential information

If information is under embargo, state the embargo before the material itself and include the exact date, time and time zone at which publication becomes permitted.

Do not assume that sending unsolicited information automatically creates a confidential relationship.

If a matter genuinely requires confidentiality before it can be discussed, explain that first and wait for agreement before sending sensitive material.

‍

What happens after you submit

Every introduction is not followed by an article.

Some subjects are logged for future research. Some become part of a broader story months later. Some are pursued immediately. Some are not pursued at all.

We do not promise a response to every submission.

We may contact you for additional information, request supporting documentation, arrange an interview or independently continue the research without further correspondence.

A request for information should not be interpreted as confirmation that an article will be published.

If we decide not to pursue a submission, we may not be able to provide individual feedback.

‍

What gets approved

There is no automatic approval formula.

A subject is more likely to progress when there is:

A real editorial question.
There is something to examine rather than simply announce.

Evidence behind the claims.
Important information can be independently checked.

A clear sense of place.
The subject has a meaningful relationship to its city, community, discipline or cultural context.

Distinctive execution.
The work demonstrates more than an attractive identity or an expensive fit-out.

Relevance beyond publicity.
There is a reason an EDIT27 reader should care even if the subject never purchased an advertisement, never became fashionable on social media and never issued a press release.

Access where it matters.
The people responsible for a project are prepared to answer reasonable factual questions when necessary.

Timing.
There is a reason to report the story now—or a reason it deserves to be rediscovered.

None of these guarantees publication.

They simply give us something worth working with.

‍

What tends not to progress

A submission is unlikely to move forward when its primary purpose is obtaining publicity rather than presenting an editorial subject.

That includes proposals centred almost entirely on:

• follower counts;
• influencer attendance;
• celebrity associations;
• unsubstantiated claims of exclusivity;
• vague luxury positioning;
• promotional superlatives;
• awards without context;
• paid-placement expectations;
• or the argument that coverage would be commercially valuable to the business.

We are also unlikely to pursue a subject where basic facts cannot be established or where material information has been deliberately misrepresented.

‍

‍

Editorial control

If EDIT27 pursues a subject, editorial control remains with EDIT27.

The subject of an article does not receive approval over:

• whether the article is published;
• its editorial angle;
• its headline;
• which other subjects are included;
• the conclusions reached;
• critical observations;
• the final wording;
• or the timing of publication.

We may confirm technical details or quotations where accuracy requires it.

Fact-checking is not editorial approval.

‍

Corrections

If something submitted to us later proves to be inaccurate, please tell us.

If the information has already appeared in a published article, correction requests should identify the article, the specific factual issue and reliable supporting evidence.

Our corrections policy is explained in The EDIT27 Standard.

‍

‍

How to submit

Send editorial introductions to:

consideration@edit27.com

Suggested subject line:
For Consideration — [Name of Place / Project] — [City]

For example:

For Consideration — Restaurant Name — Seoul

or

For Consideration — Hotel Name — Paris

In the email, please include:

1. Name of the subject
2. City and country
3. Website or primary reference
4. Your name and relationship to the subject
5. Opening or launch date, where relevant
6. A concise description of what it is
7. Why you believe EDIT27 should look more closely
8. Relevant supporting links
9. A direct contact for factual questions

Long presentations are not required.

Clarity is more useful to us than ceremony.

‍

A final note

EDIT27 does not need every remarkable place to already be famous.

Part of the reason this page exists is so that something worth knowing can reach us before everybody has agreed that it matters.

If there is a restaurant we should eat in, a hotel we should understand, a room that changes after midnight, a designer whose work is being overlooked or a cultural project that deserves more serious attention, tell us.

We may decide it is not a story.

We may decide it is.

Either way, the decision begins with the work.

‍